Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 33Malaria Research and ControlInsect Resistance and GeneticsDengue and Mosquito Control Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

REDUCED SUSCEPTIBILITY TO DELTAMETHRIN AND KDR MUTATION IN ANOPHELES STEPHENSI LISTON, A MALARIA VECTOR IN INDIA

GAYATHRI, V., MURTHY, P BALAKRISHNA·2006·Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association
DOI 10.2987/8756-971x(2006)22[678:rstdak]2.0.co;2
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The Indian urban malaria vector Anopheles stephensi Liston was selected for deltamethrin resistance for 25 generations (F25) at larval and adult stages separately in the laboratory. There was roughly a 151-fold increase in the lethal concentration (LC)50 and a 99-fold increase in the LC90 in larval selection, when the F25 was compared with the parent colony. Similarly, adult selection resulted in a 39-fold increase in the LC50 and a 31-fold increase in the LC90 in the adults. Knockdown bioassays conducted on adults (selected at the larval and adult stages) against the diagnostic concentration of insecticide-impregnated papers, namely, deltamethrin (0.05%), permethrin (0.75%), lambda-cyhalothrin (0.05%), and cyfluthrin (0.15%), revealed that the adults selected at the adult stage were more resistant to deltamethrin and the other pyrethroids than those selected at the larval stage. A significant cross-resistance to DDT was noticed only in the adults selected at the adult stage, and no cross-resistance to malathion and propoxur was observed in the adults of both resistant colonies. Polymerase chain reaction studies revealed an occurrence of heterozygote level of kdr mutation (leucine to phenylalanine) in the adults selected at the adult stage. This event was not observed in the adults selected at the larval stage. Moreover, this is the first report on the occurrence of kdr mutation in Indian An. stephensi resistant to deltamethrin.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2987/8756-971x(2006)22[678:rstdak]2.0.co;2

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Amin, 1989, Bull Entomol Res, 79, 361
  2. Batra, 2005, Indian J Med Res, 121, 55
  3. Bisset, 1997, J Med Entomol, 34, 244
  4. Bloomquist, 1996, Annu Rev Entomol, 41, 163
  5. Brodgon, 1998, Emerg Infect Dis, 4, 605
  6. Brooke, 1999, J Am Mosq Control Assoc, 15, 565
  7. Chadwick, 1977, Pestic Sci, 8, 618
  8. Chadwick, 1984, Pestic Sci, 15, 112
  9. Chakravorthy, 1992, Indian J Malariol, 29, 161
  10. Chandre, 1998, Med Vet Entomol, 12, 359
  11. Chareonviriyaphap, 2002, J Vector Ecol, 27, 222
  12. Charles, 2000, Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, 95, 201
  13. Collins, 1987, Am J Trop Med Hyg, 37, 37
  14. Enayati, 2003, Med Vet Entomol, 17, 138
  15. Gonazelez, 1990, Rev Cubana Med Trop, 40, 218
  16. Gopalan, 1996, Indian J Med Res, 103, 84
  17. Hemingway, 2000, Annu Rev Entomol, 45, 371
  18. Ingles, 1996, Insect Biochem Mol Biol, 26, 319
  19. Kumar, 2004, Ann Trop Med Parasitol, 98, 861
  20. Lund, 1983, Pestic Biochem Physiol, 20, 203
  21. Martinez-Torres, 1998, Insect Mol Biol, 7, 179
  22. Milani, 1954, Riv Parasitol, 15, 513
  23. Mittal, 2002, Curr Sci, 82, 185
  24. Miyazaki, 1996, Mol Gen Genet, 252, 61
  25. Omer, 1980, Mosq News, 40, 200
  26. Prapanthadara, 1995, Bull Entomol Res, 85, 267
  27. Prasittisuk, 1977, Pestic Sci, 8, 527
  28. Rodriguez, 1998, Rev Cubana Med Trop, 50, 129
  29. Rongsriyam, 1975, Bull Entomol Res, 65, 459
  30. Soper, 1991, Am J Trop Med Hyg, 10, 451
  31. Thomas, 1991, Entomon, 16, 1
  32. Urmila, 2001, Indian J Med Res, 113, 103
  33. Wang, 2000, J Am Mosq Control Assoc, 16, 9
  34. Williamson, 1996, Mol Gen Genet, 252, 51

Cited by

See all 33

Metadata

Authors
GAYATHRI, V., & MURTHY, P. B.
Affiliations
International Institute of Biotechnology and Toxicology (IN)
Corresponding author
MURTHY, P BALAKRISHNA
Venue
Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association
Publisher
The American Mosquito Control Association
Published
2006-12
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
678-688
ISSN
  • 1943-6270 (ISSN-L)
  • 8756-971X
DOI
10.2987/8756-971x(2006)22[678:rstdak]2.0.co;2
OpenAlex
W2107909535
Cited by
33
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Insect Resistance and Genetics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Dengue and Mosquito Control Research
Keywords
Anopheles stephensi, deltamethrin resistance, kdr mutation, pyrethroid resistance, malaria vectors, insecticide resistance selection, larval selection, cross-resistance, DDT resistance, India
MeSH terms
Animals, Anopheles, Biological Assay, Female, India, Insect Vectors, Insecticide Resistance, Insecticides, Larva, Lethal Dose 50, Malaria, Mutation, Nitriles, Pyrethrins, Selection, Genetic, Time Factors, Polymerase Chain Reaction, DNA Primers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: REDUCED SUSCEPTIBILITY TO DELTAMETHRIN AND KDR MUTATION IN ANOPHELES STEPHENSI LISTON, A MALARIA VECTOR IN INDIA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2987/8756-971x(2006)22%5B678:rstdak%5D2.0.co;2
The paper
GAYATHRI, V., & MURTHY, P. B. (2006). REDUCED SUSCEPTIBILITY TO DELTAMETHRIN AND KDR MUTATION IN ANOPHELES STEPHENSI LISTON, A MALARIA VECTOR IN INDIA. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association. https://doi.org/10.2987/8756-971x(2006)22%5B678%3Arstdak%5D2.0.co%3B2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.